Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Missile Defense: We've committed to developing proven technologies, and the new START Treaty won't stand in our way

The Way Forward on Missile Defense. By M Flournoy, Under Sec of Defense for Policy & A Carter, Under Sec of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics
We've committed to developing proven technologies, and the new START Treaty won't stand in our way.
WSJ, Jun 17, 2010

Ballistic missile defenses have matured from a Cold War idea to a real-world necessity. Threats today from ballistic missiles are real, present and growing. Iran and North Korea have extensive inventories of these weapons that threaten their neighbors. Both are working on longer-range missiles capable of posing a direct danger to the United States in the coming years. Iran's continued pursuit of an illicit nuclear program and North Korea's rash intimidation after sinking a South Korean navy ship are but the most recent reminders of the real need for effective U.S. missile defenses.

To counter Iran's ballistic missile program, President Obama announced a phased adaptive approach for European missile defense last September—a move unanimously welcomed by our NATO allies. The first phase begins next year with the deployment of radars and ship-based systems in southern Europe. Romania and Poland have agreed to host land-based defenses for the second and third phases.

A similar phased adaptive approach is being applied to missile defenses in the Middle East and East Asia. While the details of the deployments and host-country arrangements will differ by region, the common thread is significant improvement in ballistic missile defense capabilities, meant to protect our deployed forces overseas and our allies and partners.

In a departure from past approaches, we are no longer building systems anchored in one place and wedded to current threat assessments. We know that the capabilities of potential adversaries do not always progress according to intelligence assessments. Our program must adapt accordingly in the face of evolving and unpredictable threats.

We are also making continued progress in improving our ability to defend the U.S. homeland from ballistic missile attack. By the fall, the U.S. will have 30 deployed ground-based interceptors in Alaska and California, with eight more missile defense silos near completion.

The U.S. is committed to a "fly before you buy" approach supported by a rigorous and independently-monitored testing program. An essential element of that program, and a key capability for the phased adaptive approach, is the Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) interceptor. The SM-3 version deployed on Navy ships today has hit—within inches—its exact target in nine out of 10 tests. The accuracy of these tests has been confirmed in a variety of ways: by fiber-optic grids that can precisely indicate the point of impact on the target; by images taken from the interceptor in the very last moment before impact (images not available to the public for security reasons); by data from highly accurate radars and airborne sensors; and by extensive rocket sled tests and computer simulations on the ground. All these verification sources confirm that when a missile warhead was hit, it was destroyed. These results have been validated by an independent panel of experts with access to all of the classified and unclassified test data.

Missile defenses have become a topic of some discussion in the context of the Senate's consideration of the New START Treaty with Russia. The fact is that the treaty does not constrain the U.S. from testing, developing and deploying missile defenses. Nor does it prevent us from improving or expanding them. Nor does it raise the costs of doing so. We have made clear to our Russian counterparts that missile defense cooperation between us is in our mutual interest, and is not inconsistent with the need to deploy and improve our missile defense capabilities as threats arise.

U.S. ballistic missile defenses are effective, affordable and increasingly adaptable. These capabilities are critical to protecting U.S. citizens, our forces abroad, and our allies from real and growing threats.

Press Briefing

Jan 17, 2010

The White House Blog: More Support for Curbing Special Interest Influence in Our Elections
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/06/16/more-support-curbing-special-interest-influence-our-elections

Conservative: The Bad News About ObamaCare Keeps Piling Up - It's now obvious that many millions will lose the coverage they have.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704198004575310773636609374.html

At Last, Financial Reform - Barney Frank helps prevent another crisis in the credit markets
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704198004575310851924122716.html

A Stealth Attack on Capital Gains - Congress has proposed a discriminatory 'enterprise value tax' on hedge funds and other partnerships. It is a threat to any business or industry that politicians decide is no longer popular
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704009804575308981778779248.html

The President's Meeting with BP Executives: "An Important Step Towards Making the People of the Gulf Coast Whole Again"
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/06/16/important-step-towards-making-people-gulf-coast-whole-again

Pakistan-U.S. Strategic Dialogue Energy Working Group Meets in Islamabad
http://blogs.state.gov/ap/index.php/site/entry/pakistan_us_strategic_dialogue_energy

The President's Animosities - Since when was the American idea us versus them?
http://www.bipartisanalliance.com/2010/06/way-mr-obama-sees-life-in-xxi-century.html

Remarks by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, USAID Administrator Raj Shah, and Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack
2010 World Food Prize Laureate Announcement Ceremony, Ben Franklin Room, Washington, D.C.
http://www.usaid.gov/press/speeches/2010/sp100616.html

Crude Politics - The drilling experts speak out on the Obama deepwater moratorium
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704198004575311033371466938.html

United States identifies science and innovation as critical drivers to end global hunger
http://www.usaid.gov/press/releases/2010/pr100616.html

Conservatives on the oil spill and federal president: A Crisis of Competence
http://blog.heritage.org/2010/06/16/morning-bell-a-crisis-of-competence

U.S. Engagement With The International Criminal Court and The Outcome Of The Recently Concluded Review Conference. By Harold Hongju Koh, Legal Advisor, & Stephen J. Rapp, Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Issues, State Dept
Washington, DC, June 15, 2010
http://www.state.gov/s/wci/us_releases/remarks/143178.htm

Libertarian: Obama's Vision Deficit on Display
http://www.aolnews.com/opinion/article/opinion-oval-office-address-obamas-vision-deficit-on-display/19518002

The way Mr. Obama sees life in XXI century America: a tooth-and-fang world of private interests in constant struggle against the benevolent goals of government

The President's Animosities. By DANIEL HENNINGER
Since when was the American idea us versus them?WSJ, Jun 17, 2010

The oil company formerly known as British Petroleum is starting to look kind of beaten up. So it goes when a business finds itself tossed into the ring with the current president of the United States.

"We will make BP pay," Mr. Obama said Tuesday night.

There is a mood in the land that BP is getting what it deserves. Maybe so. But players in the political game who've found it convenient to join the president in the BP bear-baiting should not delude themselves that BP is a free hit. In politics, nothing happens in isolation.

The beating Mr. Obama is giving BP isn't the exception. It's the rule when this president finds himself in tension with the private sector. I can't recall any previous president with this depth of visceral, antibusiness animosity.

Amid the BP crisis, the president traveled to Carnegie Mellon University to give what was billed as a major speech on the economy. In its entirety, the speech is a guided tour through Mr. Obama's mind. The pundits carping yesterday that the president's oil-spill apologia was limp—even as BP gave him $20 billion in tribute—should check out this one.

That Pittsburgh speech wasn't just about "the economy," but the way Mr. Obama sees life in 21st century America: a tooth-and-fang world of private interests in constant struggle against the benevolent goals of government. All of this described in a tone that is extraordinary for a president.

"As November approaches," the president said, "leaders in the other party will campaign furiously on the same economic arguments they've been making for decades." They gave "tax cuts . . . to millionaires who didn't need them. They gutted regulations and put industry insiders in charge of oversight."

Mr. Obama believes that "if you're a Wall Street bank or an insurance company or an oil company, you pretty much get to play by your own rules, regardless of the consequences for everybody else." Al Gore campaigned hard against these same targets, but never with such ill will.

Americans, he says, want to compete but can't "if the irresponsibility of a few folks on Wall Street can bring our entire economy to its knees." A president is not some backwater pol running for sheriff. But his explanation of the financial crisis—the whole economy brought down by "a few" on Wall Street—is a scenario found nowhere outside a James Bond movie.

He punched out WellPoint and other insurers verbally for months until they dropped and the Democrats passed the president's health-care bill. And they'd better stay down. No longer, said Mr. Obama, would it be possible for people to be "thrown off" their coverage for reasons "contrived" by an insurance company.

He complains his predecessor left him with projected deficits of $8 trillion caused by unpaid-for tax cuts, a familiar analysis, except that Mr. Obama adds that the cuts were "skewed to the wealthy."

When in the Carnegie Mellon speech Mr. Obama turns from what he called "the dangers of an unfettered market" and discusses government—"only government has been able to do what individuals couldn't do and corporations wouldn't do"—he is virtually delirious with joy.

Of his proposed research and experimentation tax credit he says, "The possibilities of where this research might lead are endless." Regenerative medicine, educational software, intelligent prosthetics. "Imagine all the workers and small business owners and consumers who would benefit from these discoveries."

He then identifies what stands in the way of "a better future." It's that "there will always be lobbyists for the banks or the insurance industry that don't want more regulation; or the corporation that would prefer to see more tax breaks . . ." A president seeking tax breaks to the horizon for green industries wouldn't say this, unless whacking "corporations" was just too much fun.

The agenda Mr. Obama described at Carnegie Mellon is so vast you'd think he'd at least enlist the private sector's help. But there's nothing in the speech's enumerations to suggest any desire to have them along on these projects. If they contribute or comply, it will be out of intimidation. It's all him or the government or its "investments."

Some might say that instead of being a cheerleader for business, Mr. Obama is simply a tough-minded public official holding well-shod feet to the fire. I don't buy it. His tone and vocabulary, in use since he took office, goes beyond public policy. It sounds personal. Too personal for a president.

Populism in the United States is a trickier proposition than in, say, South America. Here, the private sector isn't automatically a suspect proposition. Bill Clinton played the populism card as well as anyone. Harry Truman and JFK had famous fights with big steel. But none of these Democratic presidents routinely pistol-whipped private interests in the language this one does. No previous president assembled a Cabinet with not one member from the private sector, as now.

The worldview in this White House is distinct and unusual. It wasn't a voting issue in 2008. The opposition should make it an issue in 2012, and this November. Since when was the American idea us versus them?

Press Briefing

Jan 16, 2010

The New START Treaty, by Rose Gottemoeller, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Verification, Compliance, and Implementation.
Opening Statement before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Washington, DC
http://www.state.gov/t/vci/rls/143159.htm

Russia Rises While Kyrgyzstan Burns - The violence highlights Moscow's power in a country with an important U.S. military base
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704009804575308773623569614.html

Libertarians: Guns and Free Speech - The NRA sells out to Democrats on the First Amendment
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704009804575308470831235224.html

U.S. Priorities on sub-Saharan Africa. By Johnnie Carson, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of African Affairs
Remarks for the Diplomacy Briefing Series Conference, Washington, DC
http://www.state.gov/p/af/rls/rm/2010/143144.htm

Hungary Goes for Growth - Glimmers of policy hope on the Continent
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704324304575306243153045062.html

Good Business in the Global Landscape. By Maria Otero, Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs
Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
http://www.state.gov/g/143136.htm

A Smart Response to China’s ‘Indigenous Innovation’ Policies. By Dieter Ernst
http://www.eastwestcenter.org/news-center/east-west-wire/a-smart-response-to-chinas-indigenous-innovation-policies/

EPA Paints Rosy Picture of American Power Act
http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2010/06/15/epa-paints-rosy-picture-of-american-power-act/

Government to the Economic Rescue - Historians will look back at this time and say the three-pronged strategy of TARP, fiscal stimulus and bank stress testing kept us out of the abyss
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704324304575307071188294124.html

Captains of Subsidy - Famous CEOs plead for more energy cash from Washington
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704312104575298802622225806.html

BP Doesn't Deserve a Liability Cap - The best way to deter future spills is to expose drillers to the full costs of any mistake and not let any company without proper insurance near an oil derrick
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704312104575298902528808996.html

Oil Talk - Obama is trying to link the Gulf gusher to his moribund green agenda
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704009804575309272270223654.html

Susan Rice Accepts Possibility of International Investigation of U.S. Military
http://weeklystandard.com/blogs/rice-accepts-possibility-international-investigation-us-military

Libertarian: Obama vs. BP (and You) - The government holds a company's stock price hostage
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704009804575308763321043220.html

The White House Blog - Keeping the Plan You Like
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/06/14/keeping-plan-you

Conservatives: "Side Effects: Obamacare Adds to the Ranks of the Uninsured"
http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/side-effects-obamacare-adds-to-the-ranks-of-the-uninsured

Lifetime Learners: One Student at a Time
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=11893

The Obama Energy Tax Game Plan
http://blog.heritage.org/2010/06/15/morning-bell-the-obama-energy-tax-game-plan

The White House Blog - Cooking as a Way of Life
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/06/14/cooking-a-way-life

Conservatives: Don't Repeal "Don't Ask/Don't Tell" - Don't sacrifice unit cohesion for a social experiment
http://weeklystandard.com/blogs/dont-repeal-dont-askdont-tell

Press Briefing

Jan 16, 2010

Good Business in the Global Landscape. By Maria Otero, Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs
Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
http://www.state.gov/g/143136.htm

A Smart Response to China’s ‘Indigenous Innovation’ Policies. By Dieter Ernst
http://www.eastwestcenter.org/news-center/east-west-wire/a-smart-response-to-chinas-indigenous-innovation-policies/

EPA Paints Rosy Picture of American Power Act
http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2010/06/15/epa-paints-rosy-picture-of-american-power-act/

Government to the Economic Rescue - Historians will look back at this time and say the three-pronged strategy of TARP, fiscal stimulus and bank stress testing kept us out of the abyss
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704324304575307071188294124.html

Captains of Subsidy - Famous CEOs plead for more energy cash from Washington
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704312104575298802622225806.html

BP Doesn't Deserve a Liability Cap - The best way to deter future spills is to expose drillers to the full costs of any mistake and not let any company without proper insurance near an oil derrick
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704312104575298902528808996.html

Oil Talk - Obama is trying to link the Gulf gusher to his moribund green agenda
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704009804575309272270223654.html

Susan Rice Accepts Possibility of International Investigation of U.S. Military
http://weeklystandard.com/blogs/rice-accepts-possibility-international-investigation-us-military

Libertarian: Obama vs. BP (and You) - The government holds a company's stock price hostage
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704009804575308763321043220.html

The White House Blog - Keeping the Plan You Like
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/06/14/keeping-plan-you

Conservatives: "Side Effects: Obamacare Adds to the Ranks of the Uninsured"
http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/side-effects-obamacare-adds-to-the-ranks-of-the-uninsured

Lifetime Learners: One Student at a Time
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=11893

The Obama Energy Tax Game Plan
http://blog.heritage.org/2010/06/15/morning-bell-the-obama-energy-tax-game-plan

The White House Blog - Cooking as a Way of Life
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/06/14/cooking-a-way-life

Conservatives: Don't Repeal "Don't Ask/Don't Tell" - Don't sacrifice unit cohesion for a social experiment
http://weeklystandard.com/blogs/dont-repeal-dont-askdont-tell