The life review experience: Qualitative and quantitative characteristics. Judith Katz, Noam Saadon-Grosman, Shahar Arzy. Consciousness and Cognition, Volume 48, February 2017, Pages 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.10.011
Highlights
• Life review experience (LRE) is the vivid experience of one’s life-long autobiographical memories.
• Abundant in patients in extremes situations, the LRE is yet to be thoroughly explored.
• Phenomenological investigations in patients enable to qualitatively characterize LRE.
• Quantitative investigation (LRE-scale) was composed as based on these phenomenological elements and run on 264 healthy people.
• Results hint on a potential role of the neurocognitive mechanism underlying LRE in human cognition.
Abstract
Background: The life-review experience (LRE) is a most intriguing mental phenomenon that fascinated humans from time immemorial. In LRE one sees vividly a succession of one’s own life-events. While reports of LRE are abundant in the medical, psychological and popular literature, not much is known about LRE’s cognitive and psychological basis. Moreover, while LRE is known as part of the phenomenology of near-death experience, its manifestation in the general population and in other circumstances is still to be investigated.
Methods: In a first step we studied the phenomenology of LRE by means of in-depth qualitative interview of 7 people who underwent full LRE. In a second step we extracted the main characters of LRE, to develop a questionnaire and an LRE-score that best reflects LRE phenomenology. This questionnaire was then run on 264 participants of diverse ages and backgrounds, and the resulted score was further subjected to statistical analyses.
Results: Qualitative analysis showed the LRE to manifest several subtypes of characteristics in terms of order, continuity, the covered period, extension to the future, valence, emotions, and perspective taking. Quantitative results in the normal population showed normal distribution of the LRE-score over participants.
Conclusion: Re-experiencing one’s own life-events, so-called LRE, is a phenomenon with well-defined characteristics, and its subcomponents may be also evident in healthy people. This suggests that a representation of life-events as a continuum exists in the cognitive system, and maybe further expressed in extreme conditions of psychological and physiological stress.
- Antrobus, J. (1983). REM and NREM sleep reports: Comparisons of word frequencies by cognitive classes, Psychophysiology, 20, 562–568.Google Scholar
- Avila-White, D., Schneider, A., Domhoff, G.W. (1999). The Most Recent Dreams of 12–13 year-old boys and girls: a methodological contribution to the study of dream content in teenagers. Dreaming, 9, 2/3, 163–171.Google Scholar
- Azzone, P., Freni, S., Maggiolini, A., Provantini, K., Viganò, D. (1998). How early adolescents describe their dreams: a quantitative analysis, Adolescence, 33, 129, 229–244.Google Scholar
- Barcaro, U., Calabrese, R., Cavallero, C., Diciotti, R., Navona, C. (2002). Significance of automatically detected word recurrences in dream associations, Dreaming, 12, 2, 93–107.Google Scholar
- Benjamin, L.S. (1996). Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Bucci, W. (1997). Psychoanalysis and cognitive science. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- DeLaney, G.M. (1997). In your dreams: falling, flying and other dreams themes. New York: Harper & Collins.Google Scholar
- Domhoff, G.W. (1999). New directions in study of dream content using the Hall and Van de Castle coding system, Dreaming, 9, 2/3, 115–137.Google Scholar
- Domhoff, W. (1996). Finding meaning in dreams: A quantitative approach. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Garfield, P. (2001). The universal dream key: the 12 most common dream themes around the world. New York: Harperperennial.Google Scholar
- Grinstein, A. (1983). Freud's rules of dream interpretation. Madison: Int. Univ. Press.Google Scholar
- Hall, C.S., Van de Castle, R.L. (1966). The content analysis of dreams. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- Kilroe, P. A. (2000). The dream as text. The dream as narrative, Dreaming, 10, 3, 125–138.Google Scholar
- Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P. (1990). Understanding transference: The CCRT method. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Mergenthaler, E. Stinson, C.H. (1992). Psychotherapy transcription standard. Psychotherapy research, 2, 58–75.Google Scholar
- Mergenthaler, E., Freni, S., Giampieri, E., Ferrari, R. (1998). Regole standardizzate di trascrizione delle sedute di psicoterapia, Ricerca in Psicoterapia, 1, 29–46.Google Scholar
- Pagel, J.F., Blagrove, M., Levin, R., States, B., Stickgold, B., White, S. (2001). Definitions of dream: a paradigm for comparing flying descriptive specific studies of dream, Dreaming, 11, 4, 194–202.Google Scholar
- Popp, C. A, Diguer, L., Luborsky, L., Faude, J. (1996). Repetitive relationship themes in waking narratives and dreams, Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 64(5), 1073–1078.Google Scholar
- Roccioletti, G., Zulli, A.M., & Bertini, M. (1983). Il sogno nell'età evolutiva. Una ricerca sul contenuto manifesto. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
- Schredl, M. (2002). Questionnaires and diaries as research instruments in dream research: methodological issues, Dreaming, 12, 1, 17–26.Google Scholar
- Stevens, A. (1995). Private myths. Dreams and dreaming. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
- Strauch, I., Lederbogen, S. (1999). The home dreams and waking fantasies of boys and girls between ages 9 and 15: a longitudinal study, Dreaming, 9, 2/3, 153–161.Google Scholar