The Happiness-Energy Paradox: Energy Use is Unrelated to Subjective Well-Being

The Happiness-Energy Paradox: Energy Use is Unrelated to Subjective Well-Being. Adam Okulicz-Kozaryn, Micah Altman. Applied Research in Quality of Life, Mar 12 2019, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11482-019-09719-y


Abstract: Earth’s per capita energy use continues to grow, despite technological advances and widespread calls for reduction in energy consumption. The negative environmental consequences are well known: resource depletion, pollution, and global warming. However many remain reluctant to cut energy consumption because of the widespread, although, implicit, belief that a nation’s well being depends on its energy consumption. This article systematically examines the evidential support for the relationship between energy use and subjective well-being at the societal level, by integrating data from multiple sources, collected at multiple levels of government, and spanning four decades. This analysis reveals, surprisingly, that the most common measure of subjective well-being, life satisfaction, is unrelated to energy use -- whether measured at the national, state or county level. The nil relationship between happiness and energy use is reminiscent of the well-known Easterlin Paradox, however the causal mechanisms responsible to each remain in question. We discuss the possible causes for the Happiness-Energy paradox and potential policy implications.


Keywords: Energy use Energy consumption Energy intensity of economy Sustainability Happiness Life satisfaction Subjective well-being (SWB)